Posts Tagged ‘symmetry breaking’

CP Parity in the Unitary Twist Field

July 31, 2017

In the last post, I showed how the unitary twist field theory enables a schematic method of describing quark combinations, and how it resolved that protons are stable but free neutrons are not. I thought this was fascinating and proceeded to work out solutions for other quark combinations such as the neutral Kaon decay, which you will recognize as the famous particle set that led to the discovery of charge parity violation in the weak force. My hope was to discover the equivalent schematic model for the strange quark, which combined with an up or down quark gives the quark structure for Kaons. That work is underway, but thinking about CP Parity violation made me realize something uniquely important about the Unitary Twist Field Theory approach.

CP Parity violation is a leading contender for an explanation why the universe appears to have vastly more matter than antimatter. Many theories extend the standard model (in the hopes of reconciling quantum effects with gravity). Various multi-dimensional theories and string theory approaches have been proposed, but my understanding of these indicates to me that no direct physical or geometrical explanation for CP Parity violation is built in to any of these theories. I recall one physicist writing that any new theory or extension of the standard model had better have a rock-solid basis for CP Parity violation, why CP symmetry gets broken in our universe, otherwise the theory would be worthless.

The Unitary Twist Field does have CP Parity violation built in to it in a very obvious geometric way. The theory is based on a unitary directional field in R3 with orientations possible also to I that is normal to R3. To achieve geometric quantization, twists in this field have a restoring force to +I. This restoring force ensures that twists in the field either complete integer full rotations and thus are stable in time (partial twists will fall back to the background state I direction and vanish in time).

But this background state I means that this field cannot be symmetric, you cannot have particles or antiparticles that orient to -I!! Only one background state is possible, and this builds in an asymmetry to the theory. As I try to elucidate the strange quark structure from known experimental Kaon decay processes, it immediately struck me that because the I poles set a preferred handedness to the loop combinations, and that -I states are not possible if quantization of particles is to occur–this theory has to have an intrinsic handedness preference. CP Parity violation will fall out of this theory in a very obvious geometric way. If there was ever any hope of convincing a physicist to look at my approach, or actually more important, if there was any hope of truth in the unitary twist field theory, it’s the derivation of quantization of the particle zoo and the explanation for why CP Parity violation happens in quark decay sequences.


Symmetry Breaking Particle Basis

September 14, 2015

If you have any remote connection to physics, and read any of this blog, a logical question I’d expect you to ask is why are you writing about this twist theory thing?  Don’t you know that all the action (eg, Higgs Boson) is all about symmetry breaking and the mass/massless particles that are predicted by it?  The complex interchange/absorption of mass properties to massless particles to explain or predict particles such as the Higgs?

Definitely a good question I ask myself–why do I write on this blog, why waste my time spouting silly thoughts that won’t be read by anyone–and even if it is, why not just write about the current mainstream stuff going on?

I thought about that and here’s why.  I know that there are big efforts to uncover the particle zoo participants.  People a zillion times smarter than me are working on that and there is no way I would have anything to add.  I am going where it seems there is less written about and that I have a personal interest in–the basis system for the particle zoo.  We’ve come up with all these particles and force mediators but the question of how can they exist in our universe doesn’t seem to get much attention (I’m sure it does, I just don’t see much about it).  So I write some of my ideas.  I see a way to tweak the assumption set around Maxwell’s field equations to form particles at the quantum level–see the previous post.

I think this is a fair thing to write about–I’m not pretending to be a research scientist (see sidebar where I make it clear that I’m an amateur).  There’s 163 posts over the last 15 years or so, plus or minus some, talking about lots of physics ideas from the “something from nothing” concept of universe formation all the way up to this twist field thing that I talk about as a basis for particle formation and variations.

If by some stroke of luck you see something in this blog that gives you ideas for research or a paper, go for it!  I don’t need or want credit for it–just use what you see.

Thanks for reading!